- IN THE DÁIL
- KILDARE
- NATIONAL ISSUES
- COMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY
- CHILDREN & YOUTH AFFAIRS
- disABILITY & SPECIAL NEEDS
- ECONOMICS, BUSINESS & FINANCE
- EDUCATION
- ELDERCARE
- ENVIRONMENT
- HEALTH
- JOB CREATION & UNEMPLOYMENT
- LAW, JUSTICE, DEFENCE & POLICING
- POLITICAL & PUBLIC SERVICE REFORM
- PLANNING & DEVEPOPMENT
- SOCIAL PROTECTION
- TRAFFIC & TRANSPORT
- COMMUNITIES & HOUSING
- ELECTIONS & REFERENDUMS
- MY WORK AS YOUR REPRESENTATIVE
- Stay Connected
Social Media
ELECTORAL (AMENDMENT) BILL 2011: REPORT AND FINAL STAGES
19th July 2011 Report & Final Stages – Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2011
Catherine Murphy Articles by Shane Coleman in The Sunday Tribune a few years ago drew attention to how overstated our register of electors was. Those articles showed the potential for manipulating an election given that there were more people on the register than there were electors. After that field work was done an initiative was taken to correct it. The door-to-door arrangement might have worked fine when there was a reason for a council official to knock on every door. That tended to be at a time when people paid their domestic rates by cash to the rate collector – it might even have been done on an incremental basis. However, there is no reason now and the local government system would not have the capacity for that kind of door-to-door arrangement to take place. It is essential that we consider how we might get a correct register of electors. I believe the PPS system would be a good system. On Committee Stage we discussed the number of PPS numbers relative to the population. Clearly the number of people over 18 would be smaller than that again. If that is to be taken on board, what could be done to clean up the register of electors database?
I ask the Minister to outline what is intended to deal with the issue of people who are on holidays when an election takes place. People express pure disbelief when they discover they will miss out on voting because they have planned a holiday and had no prior knowledge of when an election was likely to take place.
… Catherine Murphy The case Deputy Finian McGrath and I took sought to have preliminary figures used to start the process. I was amused that the Bill was published the day before the census figures came out, jumping the gun. The size of the population growth between now and the next census does not matter. The last census will be used to decide the number to ensure it is constitutional. I am concerned that a limit on the size will take away the option of whole county constituencies. I have issues with this that I raised on Committee Stage.
A clear vision across the entire range of representation, from local to national level, is lacking. I would like substantial, almost revolutionary, change in how we do things. People want to regain control and that will not happen unless we change the system that is at fault.
Posted by admin
on July 19, 2011. Filed under Dáil Debates,In the Dáil,Political & Public Service Reform.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
Social Media